Prove that VIXAR can expose contradictions before a release, submission, readiness, or inspection-facing decision is trusted.
Front Page
No guessing: quiz, workbook, clean-room evidence, then dashboard score.
Answer five questions so VIXAR knows what kind of follow-up you need.
02 Run the Excel demoScan the sample workbook and see real flags, not filler.
03 Review a clean roomUpload one photo and get a vision-first room-state score.
04 Read your scoreUse the dashboard to see profile, workbook, clean-room, and doctrine status.
One-site proof package. No mystery pilot.
The paid pilot should prove the chain: decision, evidence, contradiction, Truth/law, standard pressure, owner, and proof required to close.
One site or program, one decision class, one workbook/export family, one clean-room photo workflow if relevant, and one executive readiness brief.
Day Zero intake answers, sample or authorized workbook export, optional clean-room image, systems in scope, owner list, and review boundary.
Decision Readiness Record, Evidence Chain View, Readiness Heatmap, top findings, standard pressure tags, owner/action list, and executive brief export.
No release/hold decisions, no validated system claim, no regulatory filing publication, no writeback into systems of record, no replacement of QA judgment.
QA, manufacturing operations, validation, regulatory operations, and the decision owner who feels the workbook/QMS/SOR pain.
A buyer can point to the source, contradiction, Truth/law, standard pressure, owner, and proof required to close the issue.
If the pilot produces a useful proof chain, scope a starter review, Day Zero Structural Scale assessment, Forge Persona, or on-site consultation.
If they can name source, contradiction, owner, standard pressure, and next proof, VIXAR is doing something decision-info tools do not.